Modern science vs Quranic science
I begin in the name of Athiest,most gracious,most merciful
Hi this is Prophet Athiest<<<first and the final Prophet>>>who ever doesn't follows me will go to hell to enjoy 72 HIV infected Prostitues:P
Quran claims to be a book of guidance in which there is no doubt and admits no error. If this book can be interpreted by anyone to suit his or her whims that book is not a book of guidance. If you consult a map you expect all the information be truthful. If it guides you sometimes and at other times it misleads you then that map has no value to anyone. If Quran means something to one person and quite another thing to someone else, it fails to be a clear source of guidance to everyone. By claiming to be
an infallible source of guidance Quran becomes a dangerous source of misguidance. A true book of guidance should not allow itself to interpretations but must be precise and definite. Your opinion that Quran is metaphorical is not shared by Quran and
other Muslims who actually could kill you for trying to introduce bid’a (innovation).
No matter which translated Quran we read, the quranic message remain the same and every sentence is self explanatory.But still Mullahs will always blame translators for Quranic contradictions/errors/inconsistencies etc. and will try to find lame excuses to cover up Allah’s ignorance by saying you should learn arabic,arabic is a rich language etc etc,even if they fail to prove thier point,they hurl free abuses of mother,father,monkey god,few threaten of killing me,few say that you will go to hell and burn,well bullying wont help.It doesn not take a rocket scientist to comprehend what is the message Allah wants to transmit
Yusuf ali(54:17):-And we have indeed made the quran easy to understand and remember them,is there any that will receive admonation?
Muhammad boastfully claimed that the Quran is a perfect book,there is no doubt (2:1) explained in detail (6:114),Perspicous book (5:16),having clear signs(10:15), easy to understand 44:58 ,54:17, 54:22,54:32,54:40
Now let's go and dig the quranic science,I will be using yusif ali's english version
<<<Man created from Dust?>>>
Quran(3:59):-Allah created jesus out of dust[The similitude of
jesus before allah is as of Adam,he created him from dust,then said to him "BE" and he was]
Prophet Athiest:
Yes its actually very easy to understand as stated in 54:17
Mary was a virgin,and she gave birth to jesus,but according to modern science she needs a male patner or at least few drops of semen right?
So its allah who put's dust in to the virgin mary's reproductive system,which in turn acts like sperms and fertilizes the female gametes I.e egg(ovoum)????
<<< If its true then sorry in modern science dust cannot act as a sperm>>>
In the human reproductive process,
two kinds of sex cells, or gametes,are involved. The male gamete, or sperm, and the female gamete, the egg or ovum, meet in the female's reproductive system to create a new individual.
Both the male and female reproductive systems are essential for reproduction. The female needs a male to fertilize her egg, even though it is she who carries offspring through pregnancy and childbirth.
So there is no male,no sperm which can make Mary pregnent.
I challenge all the muslims to prove scientifically that women can get pregenent with out male intervention.And create some thing out of dust,forget about human,atleast create a bacteria(a single cell organism)out of dust.Till then (3:59) has no legs to stand in modern science,its unscientific,and should be thrown into dust.
The description of God making man out of the dust predates the Qur'an by thousands of years,it is found in the Bible,book of Genesis ch2:7
No comments:
Post a Comment